Uniswap fee-switch: new era for DeFi or ‘a sad day for DAOs’?
The latest iteration of Uniswap’s long awaited fee-switch proposal looks set to pass. But the milestone is seen by some as a DAO failure.
Read more (4 min) →9 stories, newest first
The latest iteration of Uniswap’s long awaited fee-switch proposal looks set to pass. But the milestone is seen by some as a DAO failure.
Read more (4 min) →According to the Bunni website, the app “maximizes liquidity provider profits in all market conditions.” Today’s losses suggest otherwise.
A study by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) claims that successful liquidity providers on Uniswap v3 mimic traditional finance.
Uniswap Labs has relegated the governance rights of UNI token holders in a controversial suite of decisions that favor Optimism.
Occasionally in earnest, yet often using decentralization theatrics, Uniswap claims to be a community-led DeFi protocol.
Uniswap is charging an extra 0.15% fee for users of its website and wallet. The trading fee will not be passed along to UNI holders.
Since teasing a new version of its decentralized exchange protocol, Uniswap has been accused of co-opting the community's open-source ethos.
The Uniswap governance forum is again debating whether to activate the protocol’s 'fee switch,' which would finally see it accrue revenue.
If it's true that a16z holds the rumored amount of UNI tokens, it would be able to unilaterally reach quorum for voting on Uniswap proposals.