Is Aave Labs’ proposal ‘extractive’? DAO debate heats up
Aave Labs’ latest proposal looks to be a step in the right direction after two months of debate. But the sums requested are considerable.
50 stories, newest first
Aave Labs’ latest proposal looks to be a step in the right direction after two months of debate. But the sums requested are considerable.
The DAO vs Labs brand ownership debate is still to be settled. Meanwhile, founder Stani Kulechov spent $30M on a new London mansion.
The author of a proposal on Aave DAO’s ownership of brand assets branded Aave Lab’s unilateral initiation of the vote “disgraceful.”
The Aave DAO seeks to take control of “brand assets” from Aave Labs, and the result will have a “long-lasting impact on DAOs in general.”
A debate over in-platform swaps has expanded into questions over who “owns” Aave, DeFi’s biggest app: Aave Labs or a DAO of tokenholders?
An Aave Labs integration of CoW Swap promising better prices and MEV protection has sparked a debate over whether fees belong to the DAO.
Proposal GIP-143 cites extensive community discussions about KPK’s performance, cost, risk exposure, and alignment with DAO objectives.
The latest iteration of Uniswap’s long awaited fee-switch proposal looks set to pass. But the milestone is seen by some as a DAO failure.
The team behind blockchain bridge Across has been accused of funnelling $23M worth of treasury funds into its own company, Risk Labs.
While some commentators called the compromised oracle key “alarming,” others stressed that fears were overblown.