Craig Wright ordered back to UK for COPA contempt of court hearing
The Australian entrepreneur failed to argue that his autism and plans for Christmas should prevent him from appearing in person.
Read more (2 min) →11 stories, newest first
The Australian entrepreneur failed to argue that his autism and plans for Christmas should prevent him from appearing in person.
Read more (2 min) →Craig Wright has not filed an appeal against his UK court verdict despite social media accounts under his name claiming otherwise.
The extraordinary order has been handed out because the judge doesn't know Craig Wright's whereabouts or whether he has left the UK for good.
Judge James Mellor has ruled that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto in the six-week COPA v. Wright case.
As the COPA v. Craig Wright trial again focused on hundreds of Satoshi's never-before-seen emails, Wright returned to the stand.
The second week of COPA v. Craig Wright saw witnesses Mike Hearn, Howard Hinnant, and Zooko Wilcox take the stand.
Skeptics of Wright asked why he needed so many pages if he was Bitcoin’s creator. After all, he could prove his identity with just 150 bytes.
On Thursday, COPA lawyers questioned bioinformatician Ignatius Pang, businessman Robert Jenkins, and cybersecurity expert Shoaib Yousuf.
Craig Wright claims that he didn't recall exactly how he destroyed the drive, but said he'd just left the hospital and hadn't slept much.
Despite claiming that, as Satoshi, he sent bitcoin to hundreds of people from 2009-2011, Craig Wright couldn't recall a single name.